Network thinking radical change for science

Why is this so? In fact, we have evolved into a typical social animals. It made a lot of this plausible explanation. The most fundamental thing is that, as social animals, we can be more beneficial in the struggle for survival. This is because social animals and can be safe to rely on emotion, this point and psychologists Rennes • Bakersfield (Lane Beckes) and Jim • Cohen (Jim Coan) observation is the same. Therefore, most of us may have felt that our relationships are actually an extension of our thoughts with the world interaction.

Today’s science and philosophy has been working with some of the bigger world view there are differences. For example, anthropologist Frederick • Bass (Fredrik Barth) said that virtually all sociological theories are based on a concept: people on Earth can be divided into different groups, ethnic, social, cultural and race.

This kind of understanding of human diversity is often referred to shape thinking or categorical thinking. Such thinking think things naturally tagged into various categories. If you think so, then we describe things actually go into the empty eyes of the word mean we believe it.

If the point of view of the employer networking, we see the world and their own vision in which position would be completely different. Take the controversial issue of race, the common sense, the different people who live in different parts of the world seems to be normal. Who would not Africans, Asians and people of Irish descent to confuse. But from the point of view of interpersonal networks, the fool can see everyone in the world can be related with any other person through six.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


5 + 5 =